Caught on the Horns of Post-Modernism
I've been reading Cosmopolis by Stephen Toulmin as part of an independent study project I've arranged with my professorial nemesis here on campus (he's trying to steer me toward the
dark side and I've been trying to resist), and 100 pages in, my face muscles are beginning to feel the strain from being rocked so freaking hard. From what I've read so far, Toulmin is arguing (well, since I'm on a post-modern tangent here I'll say what I've gathered since authorial intent is impossible to discern) that scientific and philosophical inquiry has been hijacked for the last few hundred years by an insistence on looking for abstract, general truth, instead of focusing on local, specific truth (an example being trying to define the laws of ethics instead of determining what is ethical in certain instances). Toulmin goes on to argue that this shift towards Cartesian and Newtonian broad, overarching theory was a result of the abandonment of skeptical humanism with its lack of absolute truth claims, in the face of upheaval in Western Europe and the onset of the religious wars...
...and I'm totally fine with all of that. I agree that history needs to be contextualized, and I'm fine with Toulmin arguing that social turmoil can lead to grasping for absolutes. Taking things out of context can lead to misunderstanding (like the Book of Genesis? Bingo!) and more information can be pulled from a text more accurately when interpreted in the light of its influences. Does this post seem random? Would context help? How about this- for the most part, I'm surrounded by people who are convinced of the existence of God and are fine with defining absolutes through him. I, however, am not convinced of the existence of God. Therefore, I have no system with which I can derive absolutes (though I'm convinced they exist, or at least should exist). Does this play a role in my reactionary aversion to post-modern extremes? Absolutely.
And there lies my problem. I'm building my framework in a search for metanarratives with post-modern tools and materials, so I'm unsure as to how to proceed when these tools have been marketed as metanarrative destroying objects and the piece of property I bought sits on Lake Derrida. Is it possible to accept post-modernism without eventually falling into relativism? Charles says it might be, but I'm not sure. If you want me, I'll be at Lenin's sipping on apple martinis...