Victor Hanson
I liked this article by Victor Hanson, and I'll post a few of the paragraphs I found interesting...
It turns out that the jihadists were cowards and bullies, and thus selective in their targets of hatred. A billion Chinese were left alone by radical Islam — even though the Chinese were secularists and mostly godless, as well as ruthless to their own Uighur Muslim minorities. Had bin Laden issued a fatwa against Beijing and slammed an airliner into a skyscraper in Shanghai, there is no telling what a nuclear China might have done.
India too got mostly a pass, other than the occasional murdering by Pakistani zealots. Yet India makes no effort to apologize to Muslims. When extremists occasionally riot and kill, they usually cease quickly before the response of a much more unpredictable angry populace....
Islamicists are selective in their attacks and hatred. So far global jihad avoids two billion Indians and Chinese, despite the fact that their countries are far tougher on Muslims than is the United States or Europe. In other words, the Islamicists target those whom they think they can intimidate and blackmail.
Unfettered immigration, billions in cash grants to Arab autocracies, alliances of convenience with dictatorships, triangulation with Middle Eastern patrons of terror, blaming the Jews — civilization has tried all that.
It is time to relearn the lessons from the Cold War, when we saw millions of noble Poles, Romanians, Hungarians, and Czechs as enslaved under autocracy and a hateful ideology, and in need of democracy before they could confront the Communist terror in their midst.
But until the Wall fell, we did not send billions in aid to their Eastern European dictatorships nor travel freely to Prague or Warsaw nor admit millions of Communist-ruled Bulgarians and Albanians onto our shores.
4 Comments:
Hmm. That's an interesting observation.
I guess the question we'd want to ask is how much India and China have been involved in disrupting the lives of those jihadist muslims in their respective countries. I'd wager the US has done about a billion times more than either of the others. And, neither India nor China are even remotely involved in supporting Israel.
I think the jihadsts see us as a real and present threat to their ability to maintain their rule in their respective countries and their ability to kill Israelis, and that's why they're going after us. I don't think the way we treat our muslims, or the way China and India treat theirs, has anything at all to do with it. If China started arming sepratist groups and fueling rebellions against jihadist governments, I bet they'd find themselves targeted as well.
Actually, I should have put a disclaimer in there saying I found it more interesting in light of the article J. Morgan sent to Standingoutinthecold.
Also, I think there is a lot more historical baggage in the Islam/Christianity conflict than the other. I can't remember Confucius ever punching Muhammed in his large allegorical nose.
How many Chinese military bases are there in Saudi Arabia?
How many Egyptian, or Tunisian? For that matter, how many times have non-American Saudi targets been bombed? In order to say that everything is a reaction to our presence you have to tie that blindfold pretty tight.
Post a Comment
<< Home